Review category ? Choose the review category this evidence item helps answer. Each item should be attached to exactly one category. Category 1: Workflow Scope & AI Use Category 2: Authorization & Limits Category 3: Evaluation & Readiness Category 4: Operational Monitoring & Change Control Category 5: Failure Handling & Escalation
Category 3
Evaluation & Readiness What made the team comfortable using it for this purpose?
Helpful evidence may include...
evaluation plan test plan test results red-team or adversarial testing summary prompt/output samples representative case set issue log acceptance criteria launch checklist release gate readiness memo subject-matter expert review notes known limitations residual risk note sign-off record remediation record Evidence type ? Choose the evidence type that best describes what this item helps prove for the selected review category. Evaluation Plan Test Result Test Criteria Representative Cases Failure Cases Release Gate Known Limitations Human Validation Rule Launch Approval Record Risk Acceptance Note Other
Evidence format ? Choose how reviewers should access this item: upload a private file, link to a client-controlled source, answer in text, or describe evidence that cannot be transferred. Uploaded file External link Written answer No-transfer / describe-only note
Upload file Allowed in v0: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, Markdown, PNG, JPG. Demo uploads start pending scan. Sensitivity ? Use Restricted for material with tighter access limits or sensitive customer/internal details. Use Confidential for ordinary non-public evidence. Use Low sensitivity only when the item is safe to treat as low sensitivity. Low sensitivity Confidential Restricted
Evidence owner ? Name the team or person this evidence should be associated with in the client-facing report. Use the person who can explain the context, not direct contact details.
Evidence date ? Use the date the evidence was created, approved, tested, or last materially updated.
Current status note ? Explain whether the evidence is current, partial, superseded, time-bound, or awaiting an update.
Source system ? Name where the evidence comes from, such as Notion, Jira, GitHub, Drive, a dashboard, or a policy repository.
Notes ? Add optional context that will help reviewers interpret the item without changing the evidence itself.