Review category ? Choose the review category this evidence item helps answer. Each item should be attached to exactly one category. Category 4: Operational Monitoring & Change Control
Category 4
Operational Monitoring & Change Control How do you know it is still working as intended?
Helpful evidence may include...
monitoring plan logs or log summaries dashboard screenshots review cadence alert rules issue/ticket process human review queue feedback process override records complaint records change log release notes prompt/version history model/vendor update review periodic review notes owner responsibilities Evidence type ? Choose the evidence type that best describes what this item helps prove for the selected review category. Log Description Monitoring Process Issue Ticket Process Feedback Loop Change Record Model Vendor Update Process Human Validation Rule Other
Evidence format ? Choose how reviewers should access this item: upload a private file, link to a client-controlled source, answer in text, or describe evidence that cannot be transferred. Uploaded file External link Written answer No-transfer / describe-only note
Upload file Allowed in v0: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, Markdown, PNG, JPG. Demo uploads start pending scan. Sensitivity ? Use Restricted for material with tighter access limits or sensitive customer/internal details. Use Confidential for ordinary non-public evidence. Use Low sensitivity only when the item is safe to treat as low sensitivity. Low sensitivity Confidential Restricted
Evidence owner ? Name the team or person this evidence should be associated with in the client-facing report. Use the person who can explain the context, not direct contact details.
Evidence date ? Use the date the evidence was created, approved, tested, or last materially updated.
Current status note ? Explain whether the evidence is current, partial, superseded, time-bound, or awaiting an update.
Source system ? Name where the evidence comes from, such as Notion, Jira, GitHub, Drive, a dashboard, or a policy repository.
Notes ? Add optional context that will help reviewers interpret the item without changing the evidence itself.
Mark the source evidence as superseded by this item Use this when the new evidence replaces the old record. The old item remains visible for history. Supersession reason